TomTom, a British company that “design[s] and develop[s] innovative products that make it easy for people to keep moving towards their goals,” released its Traffic Index for 2016, and it reveals something interesting: Manila doesn’t make it to the top 10. In fact, it doesn’t even make it to the list ofย 174 cities.
The city with the worst rush hour traffic is Mexico City in Mexico, where drivers experience a 59% increase in overall travel time compared to a free-flow or uncongested situation. The morning peak reaches 97%, while the evening peak reaches 94%. The heavy traffic may be attributed to an increase in jobs, businesses, and people.
Mexico is followed by: Bangkok in Thailand (57%), Lodz in Poland (54%) Istanbul in Turkey (50%), Rio de Janeiro in Brazil (47%), Moscow in Russia (44%), Bucharest in Romania (43%), Salvador and Recife in Brazil (both 43%), and Chengdu in China (41%).
The list was measured by comparing the extra travel time during peak hours against uncongested conditions.
What do you think about Manila not being included? Share your thoughts below!
Once again WhenInManila.com … Where is/are your source(s)?
I think if there was a count of vehicles moving over a measured km. Manila would be at the top or very near the top, of any list with congestion. either during congested or uncongested times.
I am sure that Manila was in the survey. the problem exists from the study see the following—The list was measured by comparing the extra travel time during peak hours against uncongested conditions. — in Manila, in congested conditions the traffic moves along at about 5 km hour and in uncongested times it moves at about 6.5 km hour.a very little difference.. about one half of 1%,
in Mexico the difference is almost 60%. in China it is 40%. Definitly not a way to measure and compare Rush Hour Traffic.
Most probably Manila was just not included in this study/survey.