Torre De Manila Skyscraper Controversy: Can The โPambansang Photobombโ Still Be Stopped?
Dozens of high rise buildings are currently taking shape across Metro Manila, but one has attracted more controversy and column inches than all others combined: Torre De Manila, the 46-storey luxury condominium tower currently rising into the sky behind Luneta Park. Will the view across one of the cityโs most culturally relevant heritage sites be changed forever, or can something still be done to stop the project?ย
Torre de Manila rising into the sky behind the Rizal Monument
As construction work continues, many are worried about the impact the finished building – which has already been nicknamed โPambansang Photobombโ – will have on the skyline behind the monument of national hero Dr. Jose P. Rizal.
The residential tower, a development by DMCI along Taft Avenue, is clearly visible from the whole of Luneta Park and sticks out of the scenery like the proverbial sore thumb. While condo owners can look forward to unobstructed views over the surrounding areas, future visitors to the park will not be so lucky. The building appears to have reached roughly half its final height at the moment, and it already dominates the skyline when looking along the center line of the park from as far back as the Quirino Grandstand.ย
The view towards Luneta Park from Quirino Grandstand
The picture is similar when seen from the other side, where the โTerror De Manilaโ, as opponents have called it, is now overshadowing Adamson University and St. Vincent de Paul Parish. The question on many peopleโs minds now is if anything can still be done to stop the project and preserve the views across this culturally sensitive area?
The answer to this, at least in theory, is definitely yes. Options to resolve the controversy could include the developer voluntarily changing the building back to its originally granted seven floors, and hence reducing its visual impact drastically, or the complete demolition of it.ย
Left and middle: The construction site. Right: The building overshadowingย St. Vincent de Paul Parish
Completely demolishing a brand new high rise building may sound like a farfetched idea, but it is certainly possible as a recent case in Turkey has shown. The countryโs highest administrative court ordered three newly built residential skyscrapers in the Zeytinburnu area of Istanbul to be demolished due to the project impacting the city’s iconic views. The legal action in this case started in 2011 and only recently came to a close after the buildings had already been completed, with the result being that Turkish courts value unspoiled views over the famous Blue Mosque higher than the interests of property developers.
The Turkish Skyscrapers about to be demolished after a court ruled that the iconic view must be protected
Closer to home, Senator Pilar Juliana โPiaโ S. Cayetano also recently suggested that demolition could be an option opponents of the Torre de Manila condominium project could push for, and this approach to the issue is already being supported by the National Parks Development Committee (NPDC), National Historical Commission of the Philippines (NHCP), the National Commission for the Culture and the Arts (NCCA), and the Knights of Rizal. Her opinion is based on the way the company acted while building the structure under its initial, different building permit. At a recent Senate hearing, Cayetano observed that the developer committed โbad faithโ when it continued work on the tower from 2012 to 2014, at a time when its zoning permit limited construction to seven stories in terms of floor area.
Torre de Manila already dominates the skyline behind Luneta Park
Citing the testimony of persons familiar with the matter, she said DMCI secured a zoning permit in June of 2012 that allowed the company to build only up to seven stories if the gross floor area was computed.ย The developer was then allowed to deviate from this earlier permit in an exemption granted by the Manila Zoning Board of Adjustments and approved by the city council in January of last year, Cayetano added.
ย โSo that means that from June 2012 to January 2014, they were in bad faith. So to me the law is very clear, if you are in bad faith, you pay for the damages of whatever cost you incurred and whatever further damages to the environment are and to other persons,โ Cayetano told reporters.
Asked if she would recommend the prosecution of DMCI, she said: โIf I recommend prosecution, which most likely I will, I will cite existing laws to that extent.โ
So will the building be reduced to rubble again soon? Many an opponent will certainly hope so, but it will require strong political will, public support and a favorable court ruling for the view across Luneta Park to be unobstructed again. Turkey has shown that it can be done, but can the Philippines follow this example? ย
Torre De Manila Skyscraper Controversy: Can The โPambansang Photobombโ Still Be Stopped?