Twitter users respond to the idea of “Anti-Animal Language”

PETA’s (People of Ethical Treatment of Animals) recently released guide on animal-sensitive language asks people to refrain from using anti-animal phrases. They justify that using such phrases like “beat a dead horse” or be the guinea pig” trivializes acts of animal cruelty.

https://www.facebook.com/official.peta/photos/a.55746449585/10157066589794586/?type=3&theater

 

Although animal safety and protection has always been an advocacy for us, PETA’s new cause is still a bit vague as to how it relates to their ultimate goal. But I suppose we could all be a little kinder to animals, in whatever form that takes. While their intent was admirable, it didn’t stop us from having a laugh or two at the different reactions which followed online.

A number of people applied the logic of PETA to different areas: books, fruits, and whatnot.

 

Someone wittily proposed how this sensitivity should extend to existing book titles like “To Kill A Mockingbird.”

 

Then we have this tongue-in-cheek reaction:

 

And these different news sites straight up baiting PETA with photos of juicy bacon and eggs:

 

Best of all is this simple logic that once again shows how the best intentions are not always met with equally good execution:

 

I personally cannot stop laughing at “curiosity thrilled the cat.” Can you think of any creative re-writes?